Tuesday, 27 April 2010
Wim Crouwel - Helvetica Movie
Tuesday, 20 April 2010
Dorsch Gallery identity
La Lorraine Typeface
ABF, Association des bibliothécaires de France
Monday, 19 April 2010
The Ecofriendly Font
The ecofriendly font that saves on ink
Sometimes, life's simplest innovations can turn out to be the most useful: cats' eyes on roads, Post-it Notes, Velcro – the sorts of things that cause a sigh of frustration for not having thought of it yourself.
Embracing blissful simplicity as a creative aide, Dutch communications company Spranq have designed a new environmentally friendly font, that looks like this:
The Ecofont saves on printing ink by … well, using less of it. Letters in the freely downloadable typeface contain multiple small circular holes, meaning that each letter requires less ink to be printed. As the designers put it: "After Dutch holey cheese, there now is a Dutch font with holes as well." Quite.
Though rather striking, the typeface is wholly readable (no pun intended) and is, apparently, most effective at nine or 10 point. It's also sans serif, because, of course, the little flourishes on serif fonts will use up more ink when being printed.
Spranq claims that the Ecofont will reduce ink use by up to 20% - not bad for something that was developed over "lots of late hours (and coffee)".
Perhaps the most intriguing thing about the font is the question it raises: why hasn't anybody thought of this before? It appears to be one of those blindingly obvious innovations that simply slipped under the radar all this time.
As it's now widely accepted that printing should be minimised, there seems little reason as to why most homes and workplaces couldn't switch some or all of their printing to the new typeface, thus saving themselves some cash and doing the environment a small favour.
Obviously, the font shouldn't be viewed as a licence to print more than you normally would, however economical it may be. In fact, Spranq actively encourages printing as little as possible and "hopes to increase environmental awareness" through the Ecofont.
All right – a new typeface isn't going to solve the planet's problems, granted (and it might not be the best choice to use in a cover letter for that dream job), but surely innovative thinking like this is a positive step in conservation on any scale? I'll leave it to you to decide: the Ecofont – example of everyday genius or waste of valuable thinking time?
Gothic Horror book covers
Boys' Adventure Book Covers
Saturday, 17 April 2010
The story of O in design
The story of O in design
A circle is a universal symbol. Or possibly myth; Plato argued the perfect circle only existed as a Form, something that we understand but never see; a circle in the real world is always merely an imperfect interconnection of adjoining dots. There again, the artist Giotto was reputed to be able to draw a perfect circle freehand.
The letter O first appears in the ancient Semitic languages of about 1000BC as the fricative consonant ain (eye). Some time later the Greeks morphed it into a vowel, and from there it slid seamlessly into the Roman alphabet. "It came to Britain around the 6th or 7th century when the Romans standardised Old English," says David Crystal, honorary professor of linguistics at the University of Wales. Yet even Crystal can't explain O's enduring popularity as an iconographic symbol. "Like the letter X it's one of the few letters that retains its shape in upper case and lower case and that, too, has multiple meanings," he suggests.
You'll see that none of the designs pictured here uses the same symbolic shorthand as Pauline Réage. There again, her Story of O, a minority-interest read of female sexual submission, is not to everyone's taste and the symbolic association of the O with the female genitalia no longer common currency – these days the O is more likely to be read as Objectification.
Curiously, this mutability is O's biggest problem. "It can mean so many things to different people," says Michael Johnson of johnsonbanks, one of the UK's leading design agencies, "that I rarely use it in my artwork. It's also a very self-contained, static shape, so it is quite limiting. It's what is adjacent to the O that signifies its meaning; Think of O2; it's the 2 that tells you the story."
Johnson also points out that the O is rarely the perfect circle of our imagination. Or Plato's perfect alphabet. "Only a couple of fonts make O a perfect circle as it makes the O look chubby on the page. Normally they are an oval. Check out your font. I bet it's an oval." He's right.
Still, whatever problems the O has, at least no one has tried to write it out of history. In a stunningly pointless exercise, in 1969 Georges Perec wrote an entire novel, A Void, without a single E. It's probably only a matter of time before O gets it in the neck. Ranges Are Nt The Nly Fruit, anyne?
Friday, 16 April 2010
Type Prints
Thursday, 15 April 2010
Bread&Butter Skincare
Wednesday, 14 April 2010
In design terms, which manifesto gets your vote?
Off-topic post on typography and politics
In the light of my present knowledge, it was a juvenile opinion to consider the sans serif as the most suitable or even the most contemporary typeface. A typeface has first to be legible, nay, readable, and a sans serif is certainly not the most legible typeface when set in quantity, let alone readable.
In time, typographical matters, in my eyes, took on a very different aspect, and to my astonishment I detected most shocking parallels between the teachings of Die neue Typographie and National Socialism and fascism. Obvious similarities consist in the ruthless restriction of typefaces, a parallel to Goebbel's infamous Gleichschaltung (enforced political conformity) and the more or less militaristic arrangement of lines.
Holbo then links to an older post he wrote about the poster for Obama's speech in the Tiergarten last year, showing a poster for the event. The post notes that a few right-wing bloggers tried to say at the time that it looked sort of fascist (a harbinger), but observes, correctly, that the type face used is in fact much more Bauhaus-ey and goes on to say that the Nazis banned Bauhaus typefaces like Futura as being a (unsurprisingly) "Jewish inventions." Nazis seem to have switched back and forth (bi-typographical, one might say), employing the strong sans serif in posters like this one but at other times relying on the well-known German-style script seen here.
The subject of typography and politics has long been an interesting one to me, and I've noted in recent elections in America that the Republicanshave gone relentlessly sans serif while Democrats tend toward the serif. See this Bush-Cheney sticker, for example, against this Kerry-Edwards. The same distinction repeated itself last year, although McCain-Palin's sans serif was far less aggressive than Bush-Cheney's, and the standard Obama-Biden serif sticker was a little less wimpy than Kerry's.
Is there typo-ideological consistency on your side of the pond?